Earlier this morning, we posted a news story about
EA having some big plans for taking on the dominance of sci-fi series Halo and Gears of War with a new title Respawn Entertainment is working on. Perhaps more interestingly, the same article from
Gamepro also makes mention of EA’s plans to alternate new Medal of Honor and Battlefield releases every year.
While Medal of Honor still has a way to go to earn back its street cred (check out our less-than-sparkling review
here), the Battlefield franchise is directly competing with Activision’s Call of Duty juggernaut. And what seems to be one of the most important factors in why Battlefield 3 is generating more buzz than Modern Warfare 3, is that it’s not restricted to a two-year development cycle. Although the Frostbite 2-powered Battlefield 3 is looking amazing, I’m wondering whether this more stringent ‘quantity over quality’ approach will negatively affect the reputation of future Battlefield titles.
Posted 08:37am 10/6/11
proofreading is your friend.
Posted 08:43am 10/6/11
Posted 08:48am 10/6/11
Posted 08:49am 10/6/11
Posted 08:53am 10/6/11
Posted 09:42am 10/6/11
Posted 09:54am 10/6/11