SONY unveiled its
Blu-ray Disc technology which it claims, thanks to the backing of nine major firms, will eventually replace DVD.
I love it how increasing the storage capacity of a disk by changing the colour of a laser is touted as the death of the original technology, when actual significant technology changes have taken years to kick in and still haven't wiped out the original markets. Look at how long CDs took to take hold, and you still find tapes everywhere, and most people are only just catching on to DVD now.
"It is a truly remarkable format, marking a new era... (The Blu-ray) is of great significance in terms of the further development of the electronics industry and the high definition broadcasting sector."
Yes, remarkable. It's a size of a CD, it looks like a DVD, but the laser's blue. Sell your DVD drives why they still have some value guys, this is revolutionary! Why don't they do something useful and fix some of the real issues with DVD technology such as DVD rot, introducing scratch-resistant media, and reducing the significant pause that accompanies a layer change on most players?
Posted 09:28am 20/2/02
Posted 09:34am 20/2/02
/me vomits
Oh, and I've lost a disc to DVD rot. :(
Posted 09:35am 20/2/02
Posted 09:41am 20/2/02
Posted 09:41am 20/2/02
I've got two DVDs that fark up some point after half way.
I was watching one for only the second time (i.e. it is not scratched) when it froze some point after half way. Tried on my PC's DVD ROM to experience the same thing.
Posted 09:43am 20/2/02
Posted 10:03am 20/2/02
Posted 10:06am 20/2/02
Sony has invented so much s*** over the last few years that never caught on.
Posted 10:06am 20/2/02
Most problems with DVD rot have been sorted out now due to better manufacturing processes.
Whatever the new format does, it will have to allow playing older material, i.e. DVDs and CDs, to really take off with any speed.
Posted 10:24am 20/2/02
But 50 gig - imagine what you could do with that!
Posted 10:29am 20/2/02
Posted 10:53am 20/2/02
I say generally because there are some on two.
God Father part 2 comes to mind. I *think*.
Posted 11:00am 20/2/02
Anywho they will need something that is new that people will want over DVD as DVD burners etc will become cheaper and more mainstream.
Posted 10:59am 20/2/02
50gig is pretty impressive however!
Posted 11:07am 20/2/02
so 50gigs isnt really that impressive.
Posted 11:21am 20/2/02
I wonder how long we have to wait till we can get movies on them. I'd rather they removed the very homosexual region coding.
Posted 11:31am 20/2/02
Posted 12:06pm 20/2/02
DVD region coding is a tool of price fixers, and price fixing is illegal. We have to suffer through lower incomes and poorer services thanks to globalisation, at least we should see SOME of the benefits.
Posted 12:11pm 20/2/02
Posted 12:23pm 20/2/02
Motorace they probably could fit them all on if the used dual layer disks but they cost more than two disks. So that might be the reasoon they often come with two discs.
Posted 01:34pm 20/2/02
Secondly, it the MPAA (American) that is ultimately responsible for the existance of region locking...in conjunction with the majoc Hollywood studios. It's designed to have control over releases to maximise profits - since they want you to see the movie in the cinema a few times...then rent the video or dvd...then buy it.
Posted 01:38pm 20/2/02
Posted 01:57pm 20/2/02
Late last year some professors at the University of Melbourne's Business School released an interesting paper about it titled The Economic Consequences of DVD Regional Restrictions. They look at just how it works and what effects it has.
It is price fixing. It is illegal. It should be stopped.
Posted 10:51am 21/2/02
By Saint
Posted 02:19pm 20/2/02
Posted 02:42pm 20/2/02
Hmm, when you say 50meg you mean 27meg untill a later date ;p
Posted 02:43pm 20/2/02
I wonder how many more newbies will post that gay joke.
Posted 03:00pm 20/2/02
Ha, I hadn't thought of it THAT way, but now that you suggest it piracy is looking a whole lot more attractive... arg me hearties.
Posted 03:19pm 20/2/02
I just wish they would make DVD's more worthwile and cheaper.
Posted 10:51am 21/2/02
By Saint
Posted 10:51am 21/2/02
By Saint
Posted 04:33pm 20/2/02
It seems to be the cheaper players that have the longer transitions.
The worst thing about DVD is the NTSC/PAL encoding and Region CSS. All discs should be shipped in some kind of multi format (NTSC/PAL/SECAM) encoding, with no bloody CSS/region encryption.
Posted 05:43pm 20/2/02
Posted 06:39pm 20/2/02
Posted 10:04pm 20/2/02
Posted 10:15pm 20/2/02
Posted 10:25pm 20/2/02
Posted 10:56pm 20/2/02
Posted 02:21am 21/2/02
Posted 02:34am 21/2/02
I doubt it - I smell another expensive, under-advertised waste of research. Someone else will always develop something better, bigger or faster - it all comes down to functionality and cost.
I.E. VHS and BETA
CD and Mini-Disc
DVD and this new blue laser thing.
Mini-Disc as a format is cheap as chips. Mini-Disc as a player/recorder is $600. No thanks. BETA owned VHS in quality..but it was too expensive and SONY and the other big boys wanted VHS to be the continued standard because of its cheapness and already widespread popularity...so it was.
Dont get me started on region locks - f*****g useless things they are. Especially when you can only get decent anime DVD's from America.
Posted 08:29am 21/2/02
Instead, I have an elcheapo but useful player (region free, no macro vision, plays mp3/vcd/svcd, and karaoke, with dolby + DTS).
On to more important things.. i picked beer, ciggies and hot chips to spend my (now) $25 on as they were consumable things that i thought a lot of the purchase price would remain in australia, considering two of them are the most highly taxed items around (isn't something like 70% of a pack of ciggies just tax?) and the other is a low priced but labour intensive product which we produce here (hot chips).
Posted 11:44am 21/2/02
I hate seeing people ash OUTSIDE their car, its like the ASH isnt good enough for their car, but it is ok for the rest of the world... I hate it soo much. Dirty cigy smokers.
O and blu-ray looks cool.
But SR is right about product vs cost -effiecncy.
You could have the worlds best thingmi better then the thingos that out, if your thingmi cost 2x as much asa thingo then thingmi wont sell to well..