18 years after the conclusion of Shenmue II, Yu Suzuki returns with the long-awaited crowdfunded sequel - decades in the making.
Shenmue III Review - Party Like its 1999
We sit down with Hearthstone’s Lead Designer Dean Ayala and Producer Melissa Corning to discuss the new dragon-themed set, the new Auto Chess inspired Battlegrounds, and more.
Hearthstone: Descent of Dragons - Blizzard on the New Expansion
We sit down with Game Director Jeff Kaplan and Lead Designer Geoff Goodman to discuss story versus PvP, sound design, Push, and the game’s interesting launch plans.
Overwatch 2 – The Big Interview
We've run Red Dead Redemption 2 through its PC paces as the series finally lands on the Desktop platform!
Red Dead Redemption 2 is Finally on PC - How Does it Fare?
Post by KostaAndreadis @ 04:58pm 27/06/19 | 2 Comments
Although that headline is about as exciting as beginning a new trilogy of Star Wars films with talk about trade negotiations, and it's stuff that doesn't really affect us in Australia, we're talking about a pretty major thing. Even though it only affects the poor citizens of Naboo and the U.S. Anyway it's the big three: Microsoft, Nintendo, and Sony holding hands and coming out against trade tariffs imposed on China.

Which have come about because master negotiator and best-est business man of all time turned president Donald Trump has decreed it be so. For, reasons. Anyway, when it comes to international trade we're not exactly experts. Or, what you would call "reasonably informed on the matter". We simply saw that the big three released a joint statement and were disappointed that it wasn't all about cross-platform play and the release of a new console called the Microtendony PlaySwitchBox.

Anyway, the entire statement can be viewed here (in PDF) and it outlines their reasons as to why a tariff placed on Chinese goods will be bad for videogames. With the headlines reading, "Our Companies and the Video Game Industry Drive U.S. Economic Growth and Technological Innovation", "Video Game Consoles Are Highly Specialized Products With Complex Supply Chains", and "Beyond Video Game Console Makers, U.S. Consumers, and U.S. Retailers, the Proposed Tariffs Would Asymmetrically Harm Small and Medium-Sized Software Developers Across America".

Essentially it calls for an exemption covering video game consoles, and opens with the statement:
While we appreciate the Administration’s efforts to protect U.S. intellectual property and preserve U.S. high-tech leadership, the disproportionate harm caused by these tariffs to U.S. consumers and businesses will undermine—not advance—these goals. Accordingly, we respectfully request that the Administration remove HTSUS subheading 9504.50.00, covering video game consoles, from the final list of tariffs, and thus refrain from applying tariffs on these products.

Which makes sense as the statement goes on to say that in 2018, over 96% of video game consoles that were imported into the United States - were made in China.


Latest Comments
Posted 07:57pm 28/6/19
Thinly-veiled "political ambiguity" trying to bash Trump while you admit you aren't political experts. Trump is using tariffs the way other Presidents used sanctions but in a business environment, this may improve the quality of console products if suicide factories like Foxconn become less
Posted 11:57am 03/7/19
Thanks for pointing to this one, K. Always interesting.
The game Trump plays is complex, detailed and well obfuscated. It would make a great Sim, but not if produced in China.
Not much point in trolling him. He holds all the cards.
Just wish him 'gl' and hope to buy an Oz made PlaySwitchBox before my own game ends.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in now!