Last month Volition's hyper FPS sandbox title Saints Row 4 was awarded Australia's first refused classification since the new R18+ rating had come into effect earlier in the year, due to the game including a controversial "anal probe" and references to several performance enhancing drugs.
Earlier last week the classification board revealed that a re-assessment would be made today on the refused title, and that verdict has come through. Sadly, Australia will still be unable to buy Saints Row 4 with a re-affirmed refused classification given by the board.
A three-member panel of the Classification Review Board has unanimously determined that the computer game Saints Row IV is classified Refused Classification.
In the Review Board’s opinion, Saints Row IV could not be accommodated within the R 18+ classification as drug use related to incentives and rewards is not permitted.
As a result of the refused classification, Saints Row 4 will prohibited from sale throughout Australia. This new decision specifically targets the standard version of Volition's title, with publisher Deep Silver previously expressing that they will be "reworking some of the code to create a version of the game for this territory by removing the content which could cause offence."
A full statement can be found on the
Classification's website.
Posted 02:16am 30/7/13
Posted 07:54am 30/7/13
Posted 08:56am 30/7/13
Posted 12:46pm 30/7/13
Working late Eorl?
Posted 01:08pm 30/7/13
Gotta bring the rage worthy news as soon as possible. I just really hope that the censored version still offers the insane gameplay that Saints Row is known for, albeit without the offending content. Guess we shall see soon enough.
Posted 01:57pm 30/7/13
On their webpage:
The part in bold I did.
There are a grand total of 5 (five) review board members.
Victoria Rubensohn, age unknown, 40+. Lawyer background.
Fiona Jolly, 45, Lawyer background.
Melissa de Zwart, age unknown 25+, Lawyer background.
Jane Smith, age unknown, 40+, O wow not a lawyer.
Peter Attard, 45, not a lawyer.
So our DIVERSE range include 4 women, 3 who are 40+. 1 apparently plays computer games, the youngest.
The 1 male on the board is also 40+.
So I highly, highly, highly doubt that these 5 people are
How could they with 3 lawyers on the panel and 4 out of 5 aged 40+?
These are the people that make the decisions for you and I about what we can/can't watch lawfully in our country. Absurd.
I really hope I'm wrong and there are more than these 5 members...
Posted 02:25pm 30/7/13
Posted 03:18pm 30/7/13
I think this is a moot point because as the post says:
It's an incomplete classification system. IMO very little material should be banned, it's up to the person to judge the material with the classification system as a guide.
Posted 03:27pm 30/7/13
Posted 03:29pm 30/7/13
Posted 03:31pm 30/7/13
Posted 04:14pm 30/7/13
Just because one stupid problem means people get around another stupid problem doesn't make the problems stupid.
Did you see the Burkha around the PAX booth for this? Australia is a f*****g joke.
Posted 04:17pm 30/7/13
At least our classification system isn't as bad as Germany's.
Posted 04:38pm 30/7/13
http://www.elitepvpers.com/news/en/2737967-saints-row-4-uncut-germany.html
Posted 05:00pm 30/7/13
Posted 08:41pm 30/7/13
Goes to show that nothing has changed, really. Sure, they changed the number from 15 to 18, but that's about it. I feel embarrassed to live in such a nanny state country. The rest of the world is laughing at us.
Posted 10:17am 31/7/13