As a pure gaming display the BenQ EX2780Q is uniformly excellent and another winner for the well-known brand.
BenQ EX2780Q Gaming Monitor Review
Baldur's Gate is coming back in a big way, we sit down with Jeff Hattem, Studio Head of Tuque Games, the Wizards of the Coast studio behind Dark Alliance.
Dark Alliance Interview - Baldur’s Gate Triumphantly Returns
Gears of War, Destiny, The Division... the influence is there, but deeper down there's more to Outriders as we explore!
Easy Rider - Hands-On with People Can Fly's Outriders
Out of retirement and back patrolling the space streets, we take an updated look at Oberon Prime and Nekros Prime
Inside the Warframe Vault - Our Guide to Oberon and Nekros Prime
Post by Steve Farrelly @ 11:06am 12/11/12 | 7 Comments
Over the weekend we reported on a class action suit filed against Blizzard Entertainment for allegedly charging customers for Battle.net Authenticators "deceptively and unfairly".

Today we have an official response from Blizzard Entertainment that outlines the suit as "without merit and filled with patently false information", and features information regarding the transparency of their notifications to customers in relation to the most recent Battle.net security hack, which occurred in August of this year revealing that they acted "quickly to provide information to the public about the situation" and that they "explained the actions" they were taking to inform individuals on exactly how the breach affected them.

"The suit’s claim that we didn’t properly notify players regarding the August 2012 security breach is not true," reads the response. "We explained the actions we were taking and let players know how the incident affected them, including the fact that no names, credit card numbers, or other sensitive financial information was disclosed. You can read our letter to players and a comprehensive FAQ related to the situation on our website."

Blizzard Entertainment also counters claims a Battle.net Authenticator is required for a minimum level of security on any Battle.net accounts, saying that the claim is "completely untrue and apparently based on a misunderstanding of the Authenticator’s purpose".

"The Battle.net Authenticator is an optional tool that players can use to further protect their Battle.net accounts in the event that their login credentials are compromised outside of Blizzard’s network infrastructure," the statement explains. "Available as a physical device or as a free app for iOS or Android devices, it offers players an added level of security against account-theft attempts that stem from sources such as phishing attacks, viruses packaged with seemingly harmless file downloads, and websites embedded with malicious code.

"When a player attaches an Authenticator to his or her account, it means that logging in to Battle.net will require the use of a random code generated by the Authenticator in addition to the player’s login credentials," the statement continues. "This helps our systems identify when it’s actually the player who is logging in and not someone who might have stolen the player’s credentials by means of one of the external theft measures mentioned above, or as a result of the player using the same account name and password on another website or service that was compromised. Considering that players are ultimately responsible for securing their own computers, and that the extra step required by the Authenticator is an added inconvenience during the log in process, we ultimately leave it up to the players to decide whether they want to add an Authenticator to their account. However, we always strongly encourage it, and we try to make it as easy as possible to do."

"Many players have voiced strong approval for our security-related efforts. Blizzard deeply appreciates the outpouring of support it has received from its players related to the frivolous claims in this particular suit," concludes the statement.



blizzard entertainmentbattle.netblizzardauthenticatorhacklawsuit





Latest Comments
trog
Posted 05:19pm 12/11/12
Dumbest class action suit ever
Dodgymon
Posted 08:19pm 12/11/12
Is it?
If no one complains about Blizzard then they will just keep up on their "you'll take what your given" attitude because we are the biggest. The bigger companies deserve to get scutinised harder because they can obviously afford it.

It wasn't until people left Diablo 3 in droves that they decided to finally fix it.
DecayingCorpse
Posted 08:31pm 12/11/12
Blizzard deeply appreciates the outpouring of support it has received from its players

couldn't give a f*** and i don't play anymore. :)
Khel
Posted 09:42pm 12/11/12
If no one complains about Blizzard then they will just keep up on their "you'll take what your given" attitude because we are the biggest.


Fair enough, if they actually did something worth complaining about, but this is just people making s*** up to try and get some money out of them.

I'll have to stop posting in these threads soon or I'll start getting accused of fanboyism again, but I'd like to think anyone with a bit of common sense could see how ridiculous and frivolous stuff like this is, regardless of their personal feelings towards the company in question.
kos
Posted 09:56pm 12/11/12
Yeah, there's a pretty big difference between genuine negative feedback or voting with your wallet/feet and seemingly baseless class action lawsuits like this.
shade
Posted 11:11pm 12/11/12
well you do essentially need third party mods to play the game effectively like dps mods, bar mods, unit frames etc. Which does increase your chance of installing a keylogger or virus, so blizz is in a way indirectly responsible for someone screwing up their game because they don't offically support mods you practically need.
Kosui
Posted 11:19pm 12/11/12
well you do essentially need third party mods to play the game effectively like dps mods, bar mods, unit frames etc. Which does increase your chance of installing a keylogger or virus, so blizz is in a way indirectly responsible for someone screwing up their game because they don't offically support mods you practically need



Somehow couldn't help but think "Shall I pre-warm sir's crack-pipe?".

Commenting has been locked for this item.
7 Comments
Show