Blizzard offered AusGamers a chance to head out to their Irvine, California-based campus for the latest on Diablo III, which included a heady catch up of events in the narrative, skills, runes and character classes field, but also gave them a chance to drop a real bomb.
A lot of people were wondering how they'd go about dealing with all of the trading that took place in the previous games, and now we can reveal to you they've taken the player-created model, adapted it for Diablo III, secured it, and are giving it back to you, with real world money transactions. It's a pretty in-depth set-up, so just head in to our feature outlining everything we learnt while there.
Click here for the full run-down.
Posted 05:14pm 01/8/11
Posted 05:18pm 01/8/11
Posted 05:36pm 01/8/11
Posted 05:48pm 01/8/11
Posted 06:01pm 01/8/11
FAIL!
isn't wow raking in enough money for them?
Posted 06:02pm 01/8/11
That's not a limitation.
It is a way to help ensure more real dollars tied up in their virtual dollars, and when you do "cash" out it costs you more.
Posted 06:19pm 01/8/11
Posted 06:28pm 01/8/11
(oh wait)
Posted 06:29pm 01/8/11
Because PC gamers believe developers owe them something.
Posted 06:37pm 01/8/11
Posted 06:39pm 01/8/11
At least this way, for those who CHOOSE to spend money on items - and make no mistake, people will do that, with or without Blizzard's blessing - can at least do so in a way that's supported by the developer
Posted 06:40pm 01/8/11
Posted 06:41pm 01/8/11
Posted 06:49pm 01/8/11
- Always on DRM, NO OFFLINE MODE AT ALL.
- Mods are expressly forbidden, NO MODS AT ALL.
Posted 07:05pm 01/8/11
Posted 07:20pm 01/8/11
Posted 08:01pm 01/8/11
Posted 08:15pm 01/8/11
Posted 08:23pm 01/8/11
Subscriptions, micro transactions, trading real dollars for virtual items that are worth d*** all when the publisher decides to switch the servers off, providing weapon upgrades that bring in-game advantages to those with extra cash to splash around...
Doesn't anybody play games because they're fun any more?
Posted 08:33pm 01/8/11
–noun
1. the playing of video or computer games.
2. Gambling
3.Child games or sports
Posted 08:49pm 01/8/11
Posted 09:06pm 01/8/11
Posted 09:20pm 01/8/11
Obes I would agree, not being able to cash out my money at any time is pretty cheap.
You can also buy gold with real world cash. Should be interesting to see the coversion rate.
The beta sounds pretty short, only a portion of the first act. Either way, WANT.
Posted 09:27pm 01/8/11
Posted 10:01pm 01/8/11
Posted 10:53pm 01/8/11
Posted 11:43pm 01/8/11
i could be wrong but i think that, if this helps keep the gaming industry stay alive and get stronger, i am all for it. as long as prices aren't excessive i don't really see the problem.. this is a way for the developers to give the consumer value added services while continuing to support the games they develop and turn over a profit (thats kinda the point of a busniess, profit that is)..
anyway thats how i see it..
last edited by TufNuT at 23:43:19 01/Aug/11
Posted 12:09am 02/8/11
Either way i am looking forward to many late nights destroying my mouse buttons again (even with the new keyboard bindings/controls)
Posted 12:36am 02/8/11
A lot of the games with micro transactions you're not forced to buy the stuff that's on offer, you can spend a large amount of time to get them but that feels like working more than gaming.
I reckon that's the bigger concern - once the game company has fingers are in the pie for extra revenue from in-game stuff after release the incentive for them is to maximise that revenue, potentially to the detriment of the underlying game. It can even swing so far that the entire purpose of the game is to buy the virtual crap on offer. (e.g. Farmville, etc)
Looks like I might be one of the few that is concerned about the trend though, so time for me to go back to waving my newspaper and yelling at kids to get off the lawn. :)
Posted 02:49am 02/8/11
What are these new keyboard bindings/controls you speak of?
Posted 03:02am 02/8/11
This way, if you want to be super serious with the game, you have a choice: spend time or spend money. You'll achieve exactly the same results either way, just depends what is more valuable to you. Some people love the grind, and are happy to spend hours playing the game and amassing their own stockpile of wealth, and more power to them. But I know if I was gonna do it, I'd just spend real money, cos I'd rather drop $5 or $10 or whatever on some gold and some gear than spend the time grinding for it, cos I just don't have that much spare time.
I guess the big potential downside to it is if nobody uses the in-game currency version of the AH, and just uses the real money version. Like everyone just starts listing their loot on the real money AH because they want to make real money from it, and then the people who want to buy gear with ingame currency from the ingame gold AH wont have much of a selection of stuff to buy.
Posted 07:42am 02/8/11
EDIT - Oh and mods are “expressly prohibited”
Yup set sail for fail.
last edited by DM at 07:42:56 02/Aug/11
Posted 07:45am 02/8/11
Posted 07:50am 02/8/11
Posted 08:20am 02/8/11
If the real money auction house stops all the spamming, and server side characters stops all the hacked characters it's shaping up to be better than d2. I'm not exactly the kind of person to put money into a game in such a way as buying gear, but it is kind of cool that blizzard are not oblivious to the fact this stuff happened regardless.
Kos the bindings are just action keys you can set abilities to i think they only use 1-5 similar to an MMO action bar. its not something you HAVE to use, but it sounds better than the quick swap buttons from D2
Posted 08:27am 02/8/11
Posted 08:31am 02/8/11
Damn! I was really hoping for some sort of complimentary WASD movement system for long walks, etc. (not replacing click to do freaking everything, just as well as).
Posted 08:33am 02/8/11
Posted 08:35am 02/8/11
Most definitely. Gold will actually retain value. One advantage of having a game like WoW under their belts is that Blizz are essentially experts in running a virtual economy.
Posted 08:44am 02/8/11
or will there be like bronze/silver for the lower down stuff?
Posted 09:11am 02/8/11
when are you ever *not* online when you game? it'll be just like starcraft 2
Posted 09:42am 02/8/11
I'm online all the time when I game, so I really doubt it will be a problem for me. I would still like to play a game I paid for if either my connection or their server went down though. For Auth worries I don't think the location of the server will matter... but playing with friends, all in Aus, on a server located in some other country sounds pretty stupid and will probably affect gameplay, which sucks.
As for the item trading, it happened in D2 (I never did) and it didn't affect me in anyway as I only played with friends. Pretty sure the same thing will happen with D3. I have no problem with this. Eventually I think Bliz will start selling items, just like they did in WoW. As long as these are purely cosmetic, I wouldn't have a problem with that either.
Posted 01:12pm 02/8/11
Posted 03:11pm 02/8/11
Posted 03:29pm 02/8/11
Posted 04:36pm 02/8/11
I might buy this game them pirate it.
Posted 05:44pm 02/8/11
Is it CLICKLCIKCLICKCLICKCLICK like D2 or will there be a rolling system like WOW/MMO's?
Posted 05:57pm 02/8/11
This removes the competition for drops and everyone gets drops randomly. Very cool system. I hated how US players would beat me in terms of lag.
I'm very excited about this. You could seriously make some money investing your time in this game now. I will most definitely be buying items I want, considering I've bought over 10 copies of d2 and still play the game and have not quit in 10 years :)
Posted 05:59pm 02/8/11
Posted 06:18pm 02/8/11
This seems like a cool idea for the reasons Nats described - it takes away the "black market" aspect and integrates it into a way that hopefully won't disrupt the economy as much.
However, this sort of makes the game sound a little like one of those free2play ones where the business model is to just cash in off you buying stacks of in-game content - except done a little craftier so a) it's not free2play at all, you have to buy it and b) you don't actually think you're buying all this in-game content because they've integrated it so cleverly they're just making money off people trading it.
So it sounds, to me, like an interesting approach. Knowing that Blizzard aren't a bunch of rank amateurs I'm sure they've thought this through in a way that will make it engaging to play - and the fact that they're focusing on auctions being their moneyspinner makes me feel a little more confident that they're not going to just gouge you all by constantly introducing new items with larger numbers that they expect you to buy.
Posted 06:24pm 02/8/11
Sony via SOE and Everquest had premium server where you essentially had a SLA of an hour for GM resolution of problems and other random useless perks. They had several servers where RMT for items and even characters was allowed.
Interestingly it didn't stamp out blackmarket at all.
Gold spammers still exist. All that happened is Sony made more money.
Posted 07:27pm 02/8/11
and just like sony. blizzard are going to make squillions off the casuals. woo for them.
Posted 07:37pm 02/8/11
i don't think you *need* to buy anything to play the game like you always could in d2