You might not have marked it in your own calendar, but we certainly did. Today is the meeting of the Standing Committee of Attorneys-General (SCAG), where every gamer's favourite topic, the introduction of an R18+ rating for videogames in Australia, is up for discussion and will be voted for or against, either by 12.30pm or 4pm. Talk about nail-biting.
So stay tuned to AusGamers throughout the day, as we're keeping a close eye on the event, and have all of our finger's crossed for the right and progressive decision we're all hoping for. If you hear the result before we do, drop a line in CAPITALS in the Comments section.
Posted 11:45am 10/12/10
Posted 11:47am 10/12/10
NAIL BITING
Posted 11:47am 10/12/10
Posted 11:48am 10/12/10
Posted 11:49am 10/12/10
Posted 11:50am 10/12/10
Posted 11:53am 10/12/10
Posted 11:59am 10/12/10
Crak there is definitely some server-side code, if any Australian player is present the bullet-immune riot cop zombies don't spawn. And I meant it just seems sad to let all the work they did do (even in one file) go to waste, from a programmer perspective...
Posted 12:09pm 10/12/10
PILLOW BITING
Posted 12:16pm 10/12/10
NIPPLE BITING
fingers crossed
last edited by ravn0s at 12:16:04 10/Dec/10
Posted 12:22pm 10/12/10
C*** BI......
Nail clipping.
Posted 12:52pm 10/12/10
You really s*** me sometimes steve.
Posted 12:56pm 10/12/10
Errm... what? Evidence, please?
Posted 12:56pm 10/12/10
Posted 01:00pm 10/12/10
My guess is that they have said that they wont, pro-activly, go back and reclassify games. Then someone has missinterpreted that information and assumed it means that you're not allowed to re-submit for re-classification.
Posted 01:01pm 10/12/10
Really? That's complete balls. I reckon it would be awesome though it Value decided to stick it to the man and resubmit l4d2 as l4d2.5 with a bunch of new content :)
Posted 01:05pm 10/12/10
Posted 01:08pm 10/12/10
This has been mentioned on several of the tv news pieces they've been playing for the past few weeks. Can't find anywhere online that mentions it though.
Posted 01:29pm 10/12/10
Posted 01:38pm 10/12/10
Posted 01:42pm 10/12/10
Posted 01:51pm 10/12/10
Doesn't matter, it's still only one file that's different. Valve changes that file and it's all good.
Posted 02:15pm 10/12/10
Posted 02:19pm 10/12/10
Posted 02:23pm 10/12/10
Posted 02:33pm 10/12/10
Posted 02:57pm 10/12/10
Posted 03:02pm 10/12/10
"Word around the halls is that a positive decision is highly unlikely today, but we'll have to wait and see"
Posted 03:09pm 10/12/10
Posted 03:13pm 10/12/10
only if they want to tell us.
Posted 03:21pm 10/12/10
I find it curious that an implementation of a Commonwealth Act is held to ransom by state AGs. If the ALP want it changed (and agree that the current system is dysfunctional), then surely they can simply amend the Act and revoke the powers of the AGs to determine the Code? Is it a constitutional issue or just a change that requires Lower and Upper approval without a plebiscite?
Posted 03:20pm 10/12/10
Posted 03:21pm 10/12/10
For those that want to follow: http://twitter.com/lauralovescake
Posted 03:25pm 10/12/10
Posted 03:27pm 10/12/10
Posted 03:30pm 10/12/10
Haha wat
Posted 03:33pm 10/12/10
Posted 03:34pm 10/12/10
Posted 03:38pm 10/12/10
Posted 03:43pm 10/12/10
Posted 03:50pm 10/12/10
Call me a jew lover otherwise.
Posted 03:55pm 10/12/10
lol @ Farrelly: Assange would have leaked this info already if he weren't under arrest
Posted 04:01pm 10/12/10
Posted 04:17pm 10/12/10
Posted 04:18pm 10/12/10
Posted 04:21pm 10/12/10
Posted 04:19pm 10/12/10
When WILL we get a result? Sometimes I wish I could slap politicians.
Posted 04:22pm 10/12/10
Gay
Posted 04:27pm 10/12/10
Posted 04:36pm 10/12/10
Posted 04:37pm 10/12/10
Posted 05:00pm 10/12/10
Posted 05:08pm 10/12/10
It's clearly a step forward, it's just a lethargically slow step forward. Have to wait until March now for the next SCAG meeting by which time the guidelines of a new category system will be drafted.
Posted 05:28pm 10/12/10
The film and video game classifications are literally the same at the moment, with the exception being that video games go no higher than MA15+. The act deliberately encompasses both and it is explicity (not implicity) the exact same code for all other levels. There is no need to do anything other than remove the clause that says that MA15+ is the highest rating for video games.
That's the only change that is required. The Board can then begin to do its job and adjudicate on what material fits where, and how it may and may not be sold.
Posted 05:30pm 10/12/10
There are R rated movies, why are there no R games? makes no sense and the arguments that are put forward against it are so stupid and retarded.
"it will make ur kids a rapist serial killer, do you support rapist and serial killers!!"
Posted 05:38pm 10/12/10
I think what's at risk here is that interactive media will have it's own ratings system in which MA15+ is watered down on what it is now and R18+ is basically what MA15+ is now or a little bit more generous.
Posted 05:42pm 10/12/10
Yeah they will probably add some bulls*** like taking into account its "interactive" therefore it has more impact therefore the same contents can be classified differently.
Posted 05:43pm 10/12/10