SEGA bring a little Christmas cheer this afternoon with news the recently
refused classification decision for Aliens vs Predator has since been overturned and the game has now been awarded with an MA15+ rating.
"It is with great pleasure that we announce the success of our appeal. We are particularly proud that the game will be released in its original entirety, with no content altered or removed whatsoever. This is a big win for Australian gamers. We applaud the Classification Review Board on making a decision that clearly considers the context of the game, and is in line with the modern expectations of reasonable Australians", Darren Macbeth, Managing Director, SEGA Australia.
This decision might not help the cause for establishing an R18+ rating for videogames in Australia, but it's nice to know that we'll all be able to play the game around the same time as our international peers - currently looking at a late February 2010 release on PC, Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3.
For more details on the game, check out AusGamers
early coverage from the 2009 E3 Expo.
Update: The classification board have also now released their
official report which goes further to state:
In the Review Board�s opinion the violence depicted in the game can be accommodated within the MA 15+ category as the violent scenes are not prolonged and are interspersed with longer non violent sequences. The violence is fantastical in nature and justified by the context of the game, set in a futuristic science-fiction world, inhabited by aliens and predators. This context serves to lessen its impact. The more contentious violence is randomly generated and is not dependent on player selection of specific moves.
Computer games classified MA 15+ are not suitable for persons under 15 years of age. MA 15+ computer games are legally restricted.
While we're glad that Australian's will be able to enjoy this game, it's still worth noting that the game has currently also been rated 18+ by the
BBFC (UK) and it's expected that other regions will also be deliberating the own age cut-offs above 15+. Think of the children indeed.
Posted 04:35pm 18/12/09
Posted 04:35pm 18/12/09
Posted 04:51pm 18/12/09
Posted 04:56pm 18/12/09
Posted 04:58pm 18/12/09
Posted 05:00pm 18/12/09
Posted 05:03pm 18/12/09
I can't help but feel that the recent attention given to the classification debate is partly responsible.
Posted 05:09pm 18/12/09
Posted 05:16pm 18/12/09
Posted 05:21pm 18/12/09
Logically it would strengthen the case for R18+. Probably force Atkinson to approve the rating because at least it wouldn't be purchased by children legally.
Posted 05:23pm 18/12/09
Posted 05:24pm 18/12/09
Posted 05:43pm 18/12/09
Posted 05:49pm 18/12/09
Posted 05:50pm 18/12/09
http://oflc.gov.au/www/cob/rwpattach.nsf/VAP/(4CA02151F94FFB778ADAEC2E6EA8653D)~Media+release+-+Announcing+decision+for+Aliens+vs+Predator+-+18+December+2009.pdf/$file/Media+release+-+Announcing+decision+for+Aliens+vs+Predator+-+18+December+2009.pdf
Posted 05:57pm 18/12/09
Fantastical violence isn't in L4D2?
This just prooves the double standards on the OFLC board. It definately belongs in the R18+ catagorey. Hopefully it getting through will have some sort of impact in strengthening the case for an R18+.
Posted 06:07pm 18/12/09
Posted 06:07pm 18/12/09
Posted 06:24pm 18/12/09
Posted 06:57pm 18/12/09
Posted 07:22pm 18/12/09
Previous rebellion games (the avp ones at least) have always been of high quality and if poor graphics is a complaint for rogue warrior then the two games were obviously made by different teams cause avp looks amazing.
Posted 07:59pm 18/12/09
Posted 10:16pm 18/12/09
Posted 10:28pm 18/12/09
and had no australian multiplayer servers. smart.
Posted 11:25pm 18/12/09
Posted 11:48pm 18/12/09
Posted 02:02am 19/12/09
Was gonna say you're wrong but the others beat me to it.
last edited by Raider at 02:02:26 19/Dec/09
Posted 02:19am 19/12/09
So there might be servers, but there wouldnt be many and they would most likely be s***, and there would be less people to play against.
Posted 02:45am 19/12/09
Posted 07:34pm 19/12/09
Posted 07:42pm 19/12/09
Posted 09:35am 21/12/09
Why are we having to justify violence? If it is violence of such a strong nature, I certainly wouldn't want my kids to see it (fictional/fantastical or real). We really do need an R18+ classification so that games such as this don't fall into the hands of kids. Maybe this will spur Atkinson to rethink his position... actually i doubt it. He certainly has proven himself immune to logic so far.
Posted 10:14am 21/12/09