AusGamers has been sent the official Classification Board report for the very recently RC'd Aliens Vs. Predator.
We have the full PDF available for you to
look at here, but the main point of contention with the game is cited as containing a "first-person perspective, (with) close up depictions of human characters being subjected to various types of violence, including explicit decapitation and dismemberment as well as locational damage such as stabbing through the chest, throat, mouth or eyes". They go on to point out "the Predator collect "Trophies" by explicitly ripping off human heads, their spinal columns dangling from severed necks. Heads can be twisted completely around in order to break a character's neck. Eyes can be stabbed through or gauged, leaving empty, bloodied eye sockets."
Thus all of this leaving the game RC'd, or as the Board put it; "In the opinion of the Board, the violence in the game causes a high playing impact due to its first-person, close-up perspective, conceptual nature and the level of explicit detail involved in the depictions. The game is therefore unsuitable for a minor to see or play and should be refused classification."
Grab the whole document to check it out for yourself, but so much of what they mentioned happened in Dead Space death sequences and Resident Evil 5, among other games, clearly branded MA 15+ ratings, with no objections from the board. The review process is a sticky one at best, and it's something we're looking deeper into.
Posted 12:48pm 04/12/09
Posted 12:55pm 04/12/09
Posted 01:12pm 04/12/09
Posted 01:15pm 04/12/09
Posted 01:15pm 04/12/09
Posted 01:17pm 04/12/09
Well so says Michael Atkinson.
Forget the fact that kids get hold of alcohol underage, drugs underage, cigarettes underage, porn underage and so on.
Posted 01:17pm 04/12/09
Even if we organise a huge protest at his doorway, all the nerds will rely on someone else to do it and we'll end up with only a handful of people.
Posted 01:22pm 04/12/09
Posted 01:23pm 04/12/09
This issue is only going to become bigger, and guess what, everyone will just import the stuff as we all feel it's so absurd.
Posted 01:29pm 04/12/09
THAT's why I'm confused. Movies come in R18+ too. An 18 y.o. can even buy a physical knife, but no 18 yr old can buy a digital game with violence?
Posted 01:32pm 04/12/09
Posted 01:33pm 04/12/09
Posted 01:39pm 04/12/09
Posted 01:47pm 04/12/09
Posted 02:40pm 04/12/09
last edited by Twisted at 14:40:07 04/Dec/09
Posted 02:41pm 04/12/09
Posted 03:26pm 04/12/09
Posted 03:26pm 04/12/09
Guess we will have to wait for him to either retire or die (of natural causes) doubt it will be too long he looks like a old fart ne ways !! and I am sure all the negative energy gamers send his way has it toll :)
@ Twisted - Very interesting I didn't know he had his finger in so many pies ... notice how all the areas he is in charge of are all the backward and corrupted parts of government . (I can tell you from experience veterans affairs is one seriously f***ed up government department) and lets not even get started on Multicultural Affairs or Justice.
@ Michael Atkinson hurry up and retire you have passed ur use by date !
Posted 06:32pm 04/12/09
"In the opinion of the Board, the violence in the game causes a high playing impact due to its first-person, close-up perspective, conceptual nature and the level of explicit detail involved in the depictions. The game is therefore unsuitable for a minor to see or play and should be refused classification."
So the game is unsuitable for a minor even though it's not intended for minors? It's like complaining that Twilight is a sucky movie 'cause it doesn't appeal to the macho in you.
Posted 06:39pm 04/12/09
Its a sucky movie because VAMPIRES DONT SPARKLE YOU F*****! :P
Posted 07:41pm 04/12/09
My little brother saw that movie when he was about 10 years old. I felt really bad for him having seen it as he was genuinely scared by it.
I think, because someone who's 10 got to see that level of violence in a movie, that there's not enough safeguards in place. Any kid can pick up a VHS tape with a cool looking cover from the bookshelf at a friends place and put it on their tellie when they aren't being fully supervised - the parents may be hosting a party and think the children are upstairs playing Pool.
Because of this risk, and it's an actual risk not a theoretical risk, no movies should be allowed to be sold that rate higher than G.
Adults cant be trusted to safe guard this content, so it should only be permitted to be screened in cinemas where all ID can be checked.
Posted 07:52pm 04/12/09
So what do you propose they should have done? I think its pretty easy to agree with their assessment that its not for minors, so shouldn't be given an M rating, it should be given an R rating. Yet, their hands are tied, they have no R rating to give, so they RC it.
While yeah, the board does seem a bit inconsistent with their decisions, and they seem to be cracking down a bit harder lately on violence, I'd be aiming my criticism more at the people who are tying the board's hands by denying them the ability to give any classification higher than M15+.
Posted 11:02pm 04/12/09
I think everyone saw that coming. I wonder if they'll offer a censored version for sale in Australia, or if we'll just miss out altogether. I don't want to buy it from overseas if there won't be a decent Australian playerbase for multiplayer antics.
Posted 11:55pm 04/12/09
Posted 12:05am 05/12/09
Posted 07:20am 05/12/09
...and there you have it.
Source
Posted 02:03pm 05/12/09
Posted 03:42pm 05/12/09
Posted 05:38pm 05/12/09
YAY!!! ABOUT TIME devs didnt cater to the bulls*** that is prohibition of their games. Awsome. I'll still get this game from over seeas and this SA f***** that bans decent games because hes to dumb to introduce a R18+ rating can suffer the wrath of all the industries he is f*****g over with his decisions. Lets hear it for supporting america/europe's economy before our own!!!!
Posted 05:44pm 05/12/09
Posted 06:41pm 05/12/09
Censored style would be better, then there would be no body as evidence....
Posted 07:07pm 05/12/09
Posted 09:56am 06/12/09
Posted 12:35am 08/12/09
Posted 02:23am 08/12/09
Posted 03:28am 08/12/09
Posted 09:36am 08/12/09
Posted 11:28am 08/12/09
Just shows u can be retarded and still be a polly
Posted 12:09pm 08/12/09
Posted 12:33pm 08/12/09
Because the game looks awesome most adults are willing to order from overseas and bypass the stupid restrictions anyway, modifying the game itself to match our MA15+ level may have just got thrown in the too hard basket.
Finally, release a press statement that takes a swipe and points the finger at the nasty censors - win/win!
Posted 12:39pm 08/12/09
Surprise, surprise: No appeal has been received.
Anyone shocked?
Source.
Posted 06:57pm 08/12/09
You've got to agree the justification in that line of the report is ridiculous. A minor can't be trusted to drive a car, does that mean the government should ban cars, too?
Posted 07:56pm 08/12/09
Posted 08:10pm 08/12/09
sophistry, semantics, and other words starting with 's'.
Posted 08:16pm 08/12/09
Posted 08:20pm 08/12/09
Posted 08:35pm 08/12/09
they're banned, whether banned from selling or owning or both, they still fall under the banner of BAND!
last edited by greazy at 20:35:29 08/Dec/09
Posted 09:06pm 08/12/09
Posted 09:35pm 08/12/09
More like they're trying to piss gamers off so someone goes on a rampage and they can go point at them & say hey look see? this is what games do they make you violent this is why we won't allow this stuff in our country aren't we great?
Posted 10:08pm 08/12/09
Posted 10:18pm 08/12/09
Posted 11:53pm 08/12/09
Posted 12:14am 09/12/09
But I think the point he's getting at though is that it's wrong to point the finger at the classification board - they're just doing their job within the lines that they're permitted to work in. IMO if anything, they've been too lenient and let many games through that they really shouldn't have.
The problem lays squarely with the lack of an R18+ rating and the people that stand in the way of that - and none of those people appear to be on the Classification Board.