Bethesda's epic sci-fi RPG is here, and it's a big one. From shipbuilding to exploring the surface of Mars, our thoughts so far.
Starfield Review... In Progress
The first trailer for Grand Theft Auto 6 is finally here.
Grand Theft Auto 6 Trailer
We take an in-depth look at Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora and tell you why it should be heavily on your radar!
Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora - a Deep-Dive into its Potential
Range-wise, the ROG Rapture GT6 is phenomenal, and it's ideal for all gaming and non-gaming-related tasks.
ASUS ROG Rapture GT6 WiFi 6 Mesh System Review
Post by Steve Farrelly @ 02:01pm 30/09/08 | 16 Comments
Instead of the usual hands-on report we give you here at AusGamers, we've approached one of this year's bigger releases, Gears of War 2, with a laundry list of fears we have about it based on previous time with the game, its predecessor and the current gaming landscape.

Will the game wow the collective gameplaying world once again, or are we in for much of the same? One thing's for sure, with close to two years of development time under their belt, Epic have no reason not to deliver something compelling (or do they?).

Hit this link for the full feature preview, and check out more of Gears of War 2 over at our game page



Buy now from Green Man Gaming Only GBP£1.97!
(compare all prices)





Latest Comments
NitMangTong
Posted 02:17pm 30/9/08
Do you have an anxiety disorder? Your only "real" fear is the 5th one, the rest are just silly.
Steve Farrelly
Posted 02:27pm 30/9/08
I don't really see how being worried one of the most visually compelling games of 2006 won't wow us again is a silly fear
Dan
Posted 02:57pm 30/9/08
I guess some might see fear as a more dramatic word. Obviously he's not life or death scared, but they might be valid concerns for those that enjoyed the first game.

On a more conflicting note. Personally I think the on-rails scripted stuff was one of Gears strengths. It made gameplay simple and easy to pickup, play and enjoy. Like a brainless action movie; and I think that's exactly what the devs were aiming for.
d0mino
Posted 03:36pm 30/9/08
im with dan on the scripted stuff, it does feel like your playing the action blockbuster. i think in some games its a bad thing, but with gears it feels right. And you can have all the open ended gameplay action for the multiplayer.

Midda
Posted 04:04pm 30/9/08
I'm kind of prone to agree that this is a silly article. If you can't see the difference in visuals between this and the original, there's something wrong with your eyes. And even if they weren't that different, who cares, the original GoW still looks better than a lot of games coming out now.
NitMangTong
Posted 04:27pm 30/9/08
A lot of what made GoW unique was the cheesy dialogue, small areas and scripted events. I hope to see them in GoW 2.

Hell yeah, baby. Everyone wants to see The Cole Train play!

For those that didn't know Cole was voiced by this guy:

Lester Speight also known as "Terrible" Terry Tate
Steve Farrelly
Posted 04:30pm 30/9/08
I disagree Midda, and strictly because I actually played the game up close. It's not that pretty anymore tbh, the standard of games has caught up measurably, and they're using old technology.

I also agree with Dan, I loved all the stuff from the first game in terms of scripting and on-rails - here it's just even more so. There's a difference between playing a great action game with some thought and skill involved and having to do this right so that triggers that though.

Again, and as stressed throughout the article, I've yet to play all the way through, but my initial concerns (more palatable?) have been met with justification
nF
Posted 05:57pm 30/9/08
(worst) thread title of the year

Sc00bs
Posted 05:58pm 30/9/08
it is a bit of a mouthfull hey.
nF
Posted 06:09pm 30/9/08
thats what she said.
Sc00bs
Posted 06:14pm 30/9/08
snap

Steve Farrelly
Posted 07:35pm 30/9/08
agreed and fixed
Spook
Posted 07:41pm 30/9/08
On a more conflicting note. Personally I think the on-rails scripted stuff was one of Gears strengths. It made gameplay simple and easy to pickup, play and enjoy. Like a brainless action movie; and I think that's exactly what the devs were aiming for.


yer, i agree;

i got totally sucked into the scripted element of gow, and i loved it;

i knew i had no choice in what was happening, but i didnt care, coz i was enjoying it so much;
Gaz
Posted 10:09am 01/10/08
This article is way too cynical bordering on the scare-mongering paranoia
giririsss
Posted 10:47am 01/10/08
Fear 1, valid, i'd liked to have known more, but it was an action game so you just got over it. Glad they're trying.
Fear 2, it's an action game, it's meant to be cheesy. I'd be more "fearful" about a heart fealt story breaking up this sort of game flow.
Fear 3, yeah and no, gow is still one of the best games out, if they got the most out of the system that is possible, then there's not much more room too improve. I can't actually think of one that looks better (tho we're lead to believe bayonetta does).
Fear 4, Once again, like everyone said, i think the directfull and scripted nature worked, but if like you've said it's gone to the point of reptitive tediousness...........
Fear 5, thats a fear of every game, not just sequels.

Over all, different way to aproach a preview, but not sure if it worked >< (Similar to the sc4 rant about game "4".)
LOTUK
Posted 08:24pm 01/10/08
Thanks for an article that addresses concerns instead of praising the very ground the game has yet to walk upon. I get so sick of seeing a preview where it is so obviously cheap or something yet all the previewers kiss its ass right up to the review where they then point out these issues that are still present.

Not saying every game should be bagged throughout production, but I want to hear the bad with the good to make up my mind. not feel that I have to wait till past release day to find out that "Oh yeah, the graphics are crap and the combat boring" is the common ground between reviewers.
Commenting has been locked for this item.
16 Comments
Show