LAPD is driving new police commodoreMaybe, but that's just a one off. The real news is Holden is tendering a modified Holden Caprice to possibly win US police force contracts, hopefully filling the role of 70,000 US Police Cruisers. http://www.chevroletcapriceppv.com/#home http://www.carsales.com.au/news/2009/large-passenger/holden/caprice/holden-unveils-police-caprice-16924 http://www.themotorreport.com.au/44007/holden-statesman-based-chevrolet-caprice-police-patrol-vehicle-confirmed/ http://www.goauto.com.au/mellor/mellor.nsf/story2/4DB981DD3B661FE0CA25764600253D2B http://www.themotorreport.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/2011-chevroletcapriceppv-holdenstatesmanbased-01.jpg This is all brilliant news for US police forces who lament the day in 1996 when the real Chevrolet Caprice was killed off. It was by far the best police car the world had ever seen, with enough space for criminal transport, gun racks, seats built for holsters and divvy shield. In the US they even had small businesses buying in late model Caprices (the real caprices) and reconditioning them and selling back to the coppers cos they loved them so much! The 'real' Chevrolet Caprice in full 9C1 (cop cruiser) spec: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2313/2176210942_2e9f3d63c5.jpg last edited by hardware at 23:29:06 06/Oct/09 |
are you angry it's not a ford falcon running lpg mr hardware?
|
no, the falcons are too small for US cruisers and ford no longer makes the LWB Fairlane and LTD
and there is no point to LPG in the US because their petrol is basically tax free, if we had the same level of tax on our petrol here it'd be about 65cpl. http://www.gminsidenews.com/forums/gallery/data/500/medium/cap5.jpg Doesn't that look the goods! last edited by hardware at 23:27:16 06/Oct/09 |
oooh the G8 pontiac is sexier in pictures then in person. fun to drive, though its essentially a commodore.
|
I still think this is still the best looking police cruiser, probably due to my brain being infused with them from all the car chases I watched growing up :)
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3065/2943400346_5fbdb53fde.jpg |
almost guvna, almost
http://www.carlustblog.com/images/2008/07/21/bluesmobile1.jpg |
Funny how they say its too small, everything in the US is too small for them heh :)
Seen some funny police cars here in europe, Golf's, 5 series, E class, Focus's |
and there is no point to LPG in the US because their petrol is basically tax free, if we had the same level of tax on our petrol here it'd be about 65cpl. ... and also because Americans don't subsidise stupid fuels. However I was curious, so... Average gas price in LA is $3.04/gallon. Which is 80c/L. The tax is 65c. So thats 17c per litre on top of 0.63c per litre cost Australia its 38c per litre + GST (on top of that) So if fuel in Brisbane is $1.15 a litre today. (What I paid.) The tax is 49c on top of a fuel cost of 66c. So thats US43c of tax with a fuel cost of US0.58c. So Australia ain't that bad. I wouldn't to compare to stupid communist countries like the UK or France. Those c**** get put over a barrel by their governments. |
Last time I paid for a litre of fuel just before the airport at Amsterdam I paid 1.44 EUROS, Australia has it pretty good.
|
holy s*** that caprice is huge, where do i get one? minus the cop s*** obviously.
|
Re original pics: Pontiac is discontinued. How old are those photos??
|
quite old as the bumpers are still the regular pontiac ones, the third pic has the proper squad car bumpers
|
oh god, sad c**** getting a raging boner over f***en commodores and s*** stupid yank tanks. any wonder america is dying with 'ingenuity' such as that.
|
holy s*** that caprice is huge, where do i get one? from holden? |
and also because Americans don't subsidise stupid fuelsWe don't subsidise any fuels, we just don't put an excise on the good ones (LPG/CNG). and LA (california) has the higest fuel tax per gallon in the US, double most states http://www.texasgasprices.com/tax_info.aspx if you take a random average state and work it out, it comes to 65cpl like i said. but yes, euro countries are stupid in their fuel taxing. why make diesel cheaper than petrol? it has more oil and pollution in it! i don't see why fuel is so bad that we need more than just gst on it. last edited by hardware at 11:33:22 07/Oct/09 |
they dont have the s*** diesel we have here, in europe.
and besides diesels get better kilometerage. and besides, does europe need any more cars on the road, they didn't plan their lives around living 15kms away from EVERYTHING like we do in australia and they do in america with s*** useless public transport that makes it a necessity in most cases to have a car. and besides the people over there who drive cars are the ones who either need to or the wealthier ones who can afford it not shaz and daz from ipswich with their clapped out XD falcon. and besides the europes can actually still sell cars, so they must be doing something right. |
why make diesel cheaper than petrol? petrol requires more refining than diesel, hence it should be more expensive in Australia we have more tax on diesel for reasons which I have now forgotten its annoying though, I should be paying less for my diesel |
I've seen diesel prices less than regular unleaded now.
I think if you are a new car owner, chances are you're not an enthusiest. You may like to gunn it off at the lights and do some skids, but you're not going to crack that plastic cover off the engine for fear of warranty void. Its for this reason I think everyone who's getting a new car should just get diesel if they don't want electric. You get more Km per L, and more KM per $. You can even probably feel good about the environment. |
Not only do you get more km/l but they are a s*** load better to drive.
They produce all their torque around 2,000rpm, where you need it most, not something like 4,500rpm like most petrols. |
And diesel engines costs more than the petrol engine so you gotta price up if you'll cover the cost with the savings in using diesel.
|
Yeah they do cost a bit more but, like most things, you pay for what you get.
I've had both petrol and diesel and I wouldn't buy another petrol again. |
petrol requires more refining than diesel, hence it should be more expensive 1. Not anymore since govt mandated low sulphur diesel. Back before 2000 when we had ultra-polluting dirty diseasel, it was cheaper because it was easier to refine. Not anymore. 2. Its only by about a cent or two and that i believe is due to energy content per litre or pollution per litre or something like that 3. No you shouldn't. You should be paying more because oil use should be discouraged. Also ticman is right, and the payback period for most diesels is well, well in excess of the time you're likely to have the car. I'm talking in excess of a decade. |
It really has nothing to do with 'payback' time.
The fact that they use less fuel is secondary. They are primarily (I'm refering to most modern common rail diesels) a superior engine. So by opting for the diesel you are choosing a better product that just happens to be cheaper to run. The only downside (which is pretty minor) is they aren't as refined when cold and idling. This is only marginal though. |
so mission if they sound like a tractor, idle like s*** when cold, why and how are they a superior engine? And don't say bags of torque at 2000rpm, that's just the turbo talking. Strap a turbo to anything and it'll be brilliant. (yes yes i'm no longer a turbo hater)
|
I agree, why don't they just strap a turbo to anything? If that's all it takes to make a better engine?
I'm no engineer but they must have good reason not to make all petrol engines turbo. Reliability, longevity, cost? I dunno, but they don't (just strap on a turbo). So yes, that is one factor that makes them better because the equivilant petrol doesn't have a turbo. So, diesels have a turbo that gives them bags of torque @ 2,000rpm which commonly available petrol engines in affordable cars don't. Check. Diesels have been proven and are the engine of choice in the following applications: - agriculture - trucks - trains - miliatary vehicles - boats - 4WD's Basically any demanding application diesels are used. So they must have qualities that petrols don't offer, right? Check. Read any car review where the vehicle is offered in both petrol and diesel and the bottom line is 'Get the diesel'. Check. If you love petrol engines, great, but diesel is better :) |
Yes i see where you're coming from mission, and a few points you raise are very valid ones, but in some of them you've got to drill deeper.
The main reason I reckon why they don't just strap a turbo to a petrol motor is because the same effect (or better) can be had for far cheaper by just making it bigger. Diesel motors are inherently rather heavy so larger is to be avoided at all costs, and this cost for improvement comes in the form of a turbo. It's amazing the number of people who would never own a turbo petrol, but a turbo diesel sounds to them like an excellently sensible idea. The most popular motor in demanding applications in passenger cars is LPG 6-cyl motors, not turbo diesels. Those applications you list there often choose diesel motors because of their supreme ability to shift something insanely heavy, not cart yourself and a few kiddys around. And i believe the reviewers in car magazines will tell you which is the better one to drive, not which has the lowest TCO. The better drive i'm sure is only due to the turbo, and if you compared apples to apples and pitted a turbo diesel with a turbo petrol, i think there'd be no question that the turbo petrol would win. Don't get me wrong, i'm slowly being converted to liking turbo diesels (this is not a win for you Jim despite the fact you predicted it) after i took a nice 350km drive in a Hyundai i30 TD on the weekend and loved every minute of it. |
Heh we have the i30 CRDi :P
And i believe the reviewers in car magazines will tell you which is the better one to drive, not which has the lowest TCO. Exactly my point. Diesels aren't just about lower running costs, because as already stated it will take a while to recoup the inital additional outlay. But if you hit up the NRMA website you'll see the CRDi i30 has a lower TCO than than the petrol i30 over a 5 year period, so...... someones assumptions and calculations are wrong. The most popular motor in demanding applications in passenger cars is LPG 6-cyl motors There isn't really any other choice? |
lol payback time, who gives a f***
I want monstrous amounts of torque to pull my ass out of the mud or to tow a boat I bought a diesel because I can get 700+ks out of a tank and they are better for four wheel driving (imo) also sifn't crack that plastic off your new diesel motor http://unix.org.au/~brett/hilux/boost/resize/boost01.jpg http://unix.org.au/~brett/hilux/boost/resize/boost02.jpg |
Well i believe the i30 is a bit of a unique scenario, there aren't too many cars where the smallest petrol engine's consumption is ~40% worse than the turbo diesel's consumption. usually it's not that good hence blowing out the time to recoup costs.
i heard they were running a few Mercedes Benz E2hunredandsomething CDI's as silvers and the TCO was way, way up and beyond that of a gas fairlane. |
no no, this is fact. check it yourself!
|
The most popular motor in demanding applications in passenger cars is LPG 6-cyl motors, not turbo diesels. Those applications you list there often choose diesel motors because of their supreme ability to shift something insanely heavy, not cart yourself and a few kiddys around.In which dimension is that? Heres a list of fuel efficient cars, most of them are city cars but I forgot what this thread is about anymore http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/02/report-all-of-europes-15-most-fuel-efficient-cars-get-better-t/ last edited by Infidel at 18:27:17 07/Oct/09 |
hyundai i30 - 55% difference (4.7 / 7.2)
ford focus - 27% difference (5.6 / 7.1) and yes the volkswagens are almost as good as the i30 in australia infidel, think of couriers and taxis and limos etc |
I bought a diesel because I can get 700+ks out of a tank and they are better for four wheel driving (imo) Excepting consumption, I don't think that's true. My petrol V8 isn't exactly a powerhouse, but it makes bags (small bags) of torque over its entire rev range, not in a huge lump at 1500rpm. You're better off with a petrol off road. The last thing you want is to run out of puff in a gear at 2500rpm, and have to shift up. With a petrol you're only just coming into the power band, so its no drama. Just keep revving to 5 grand or whatever. With diesel you are stuck climbing things at a narrow speed range if you want to stay in that lump of torque at 1500rpm. Fine if you've got all the lockers, articulation, tyres and clearance to climb straight over things at speed. Not so much if you have to stop, change your line and gas it up to get over s***. That said, its better than LPG. |
Yes, but you said all cars not cars in Australia which is why I bit :( If Australia didnt have easy access to gas it wouldnt be like that. The only places where LPG is quite popular in Europe is parts of eastern europe.
|
I drove it to Sydney the day after I picked it up
http://unix.org.au/~brett/hilux/sydtrip08/resize/IMG_0132.JPG we drove up to Bribie beach for the day too so its combined highway/around town and sand driving (but mostly highway) heres me panicking because it had been on "Range 0km" for like 40k's and I was on that stretch of highway south of the border which has "no fuel for 100+k's" http://unix.org.au/~brett/hilux/sydtrip08/resize/IMG_0134.JPG I picked it up at Toyota Ipswich, pressed the ODO reset button button for Trip A as soon as I remembered (somewhere on the southside of Brisbane) so it did 700ks on its first tank and the economy has only gotten better since then /pimping diesel for economy I like having my torque available in the low rev range, I've never come across a problem that I couldn't have predicted with the right gear since figuring out the motor and gearing the one time I did get stuck in sand because I had the wrong gear range all together (first day on Bribie), I was well and truly stuck - had to low range it out |