Where we talk about the three Cs: the camera, the control and the combat.
We Chat to The Division 2's Game Director David Kennedy
An explosion several years in the making.
Crackdown 3 Review - Boom! Shake The Room
An astonishing achievement, this post-apocalyptic shooter offers an experience that lives up to its ambition and promise, offering challenge and surprise in equal measure.
Metro Exodus Review - You Won't Fall Out of This Carriage
We play through the neon colours of Far Cry New Dawn, the direct standalone sequel to the events of Far Cry 5
Far Cry New Dawn Review - A New Dawn, A Nuke Day
Will the Real Pinkertons Please Stand Up, for the Honourable Judge J...
Steve Farrelly
AusGamers Editor
Sydney, New South Wales
7987 posts
I'm giving myself a pat on the back for that headline, but to the actual details behind it: the real Pinkerton agency, now a subsidiary of Securitas AB and also now known as Pinkerton Consulting & Investigations, is incensed that Take-Two and Rockstar have made so much money off the success of Red Dead Redemption 2, and seemingly want a piece of that pie because they 'appear' in the game.



To be fair, the agency does appear in the game and has a substantial role to play in its story, but they're also a part of US history -- specifically around the era in which the game is set. The Pinkertons, as a result of, you know, being a part of US history have also appeared in popular movies and TV series based on the Wild West, such as their consistent mentions and appearances in Dead Wood.

Now, thanks to a report over at The Verge, we've learnt that the Pinkertons have sent a cease-and-desist order to Take-Two in regards to Red Dead Redemption 2 and their inclusion in the game, while also demanding either a cash settlement or continued royalties. Take-Two, however, is having none of this, filing their own lawsuit against the Pinkerton agency, suing them for attempting to profit off the success of the game, while citing the aforementioned inclusion of the agency in other forms of media. Their suit claims this is a violation of their First Amendments rights saying:
Historical fiction— television, movies, plays, books, and games — would suffer greatly if trademark claims like [Pinkerton’s] could even possibly succeed. [Pinkerton] cannot use trademark law to own the past.
The full story over at The Verge features comments from the Pinkertons in response to Take-Two's suit, as well as the publisher's full filing as submitted, for those of you versed in legalese.

Do you think they're entitled to any form of restitution for their inclusion in the fiction?
04:47pm 16/01/19 Permalink
system
Internet
--
04:47pm 16/01/19 Permalink
FSCB
South Australia
176 posts
Haha the Pinkertons...still a bunch of punks 100+ years later.
07:44pm 16/01/19 Permalink
Hunter
Australian Capital Territory
54 posts
...as a minimum they should have a credit added to the credit roll - for all I know they do already...
09:24am 18/01/19 Permalink
system
Internet
--
09:24am 18/01/19 Permalink
AusGamers Forums
Show: per page
1
Post a Reply
You must be logged in to post a reply.