




|
Post by Eorl @ 10:54am 18/01/13 | 18 Comments
![]() Hall also mentions that while "the average gamer knows the difference individual people don't", revealing that the creator has been undergoing criticism from family and friends mistaking the difference and confronting him about the unethical decisions. I really don't think anyone can understand just quite how exasperated that can make you feel when you've gambled everything on something, put your whole self and reputation on the line. So it hasn't made my life very pleasant and I disagree entirely with the conduct and how consumers have been treated.Previously The War Z was pulled off Steam shortly after going on sale, with claims that the store page was misleading and referring to non-existent gameplay mechanics. The game has since been kept off the store, with no outlook as to when and if it will ever be back.
|
|
Posted 12:32pm 18/1/13
I knew as soon as The War Z was announced they where aiming to get people to play through the confusion.
Posted 01:02pm 18/1/13
It took just looking at the name, noticing it wasn't "DayZ" and thinking "huh, I wonder what that's about".
Then I looked it up and in under 5 minutes found the forums and a bunch of "info" on it.
Posted 01:35pm 18/1/13
Posted 01:36pm 18/1/13
Posted 01:37pm 18/1/13
game is shite, devs are scumbags
Posted 01:55pm 18/1/13
I should have said, "somewhat up to date with gaming news in general". They keep up to date with releases and just general news, but don't go that extra little bit that others, such as myself, do.
They knew that a DayZ standalone was coming out, and thought it was The War Z. My suspicions are first where that they named it this to ride on the coattails of DayZ's success, and with all the shit drama over the last couple months it's clear that was their intention.
Especially given the Steam release (however brief) it would seem like it was a legit game and out for release.
I think once the DayZ standalone is out however, Rocket and his team will see the kinda of success they deserve. If they follow the Minecraft model, I sure as hell will be getting it right off the bat. The only thing that's been disappointing about Minecraft was the long promised (and long delayed) mod API. The devs has been really cool about support and everything else.
Posted 02:33pm 18/1/13
Posted 04:49pm 18/1/13
Posted 01:14pm 19/1/13
Posted 01:21pm 19/1/13
I thought it was another shit zombie movie, I figured Day Z "standalone" would have kept the Day Z name.
Posted 01:30pm 19/1/13
Posted 01:42pm 19/1/13
Posted 01:45pm 19/1/13
Posted 02:25pm 19/1/13
Chances are you didnt do your research. Sucks you bought a shit game but if you are happy to splash $15 or whatever it was on a game without being pretty damn sure of it, then you have yourself to blame. And if $15 is fuck all to you, then why complain about a shitty ass $15 game. I have no doubt the WarZ people tried to trick people into buying their game thinking it was the DayZ stand alone but when the steam page doesnt have DayZ plastered all over it, then it should ring some warning bells that maybe this isnt actually what you think it is.
Posted 10:36pm 19/1/13
Posted 12:49am 21/1/13
Buying a fucking video game should not require a background check. There is absolutely nothing wrong with wanting the industry to adhere to an ethical standard of behaviour and quality.
I'm not saying its a realistic goal, but there is nothing wrong with striving for it.
As for the original subject, as if we needed yet another reason to hate that toad Sergei Titov.
Posted 04:40am 21/1/13
Posted 06:22am 21/1/13
One is an official release being built out of a popular mod in a new engine, the other is a very similar game with a similar name which had a lot of drama for advertising features which weren't in the game yet.
For the life of me, I can't remember which is which.