One of the the common complaints levelled by critics at the last few games in the hugely successful Call of Duty series is that the games' underlying engine tech is getting too long in the tooth. Speaking with
Official Xbox Magazine UK, Treyarch Design Director David Vonderhaar has come out in defence of the performance of the so-called IW Engine, asserting that much has evolved in the years since its creation, and reminding us that it still hits a smooth 60 frames per second on consoles:
"Anybody who comes at the engine needs to remember it's the 60 frames they love in the first place," Vondehaar reiterated. "And we can make it beautiful - that's through years and years of working with the engine, improving upon it and improving the pipeline and improving our approach, our lighting rendering.
"People like to talk about the engine, but the truth of the matter is that this isn't like something that was invented six years ago," he went on. "At this point that engine doesn't resemble anything like any engine - we've ripped out the UI system, the rendering and the lighting are all new, the core gameplay systems are all new."
"To me, it's like I never really understood," Vondehaar confessed. "It runs at 60 and it's gorgeous. What exactly is there to be upset about with the engine?"
The pursuit of 60 frames per second is a noble one on consoles, but we're not so sure the argument holds up when the PC version of the game is considered. Treyarch might do better to stick to promoting their gameplay innovations this time around as the draw factor. What does everyone else think?
Posted 11:14am 11/10/12
Posted 11:30am 11/10/12
Posted 11:35am 11/10/12
And it's just a better experience for an FPS. I am only commenting on consoles btw, and granted bf3 looks amazing compared to cod.
So I agree with the dev, but only regarding consoles.
Posted 11:38am 11/10/12
Posted 12:42pm 11/10/12
There's also the other issue that the things the engine can't do are responsible for a lot of the repetitive game play.
I wish they just came out and said the truth, "we decided to stick with this until next gen consoles, which has taken longer than we expected."
This has got to be the last COD on this engine though.. right?
Posted 01:07pm 11/10/12
One of these two claims is not true.
I'll let you work out which ...
Posted 04:34pm 11/10/12
Maybe they were talking about 60fps on an iphone or something and just forgot to mention it?
Posted 05:30pm 11/10/12
Posted 06:04pm 11/10/12
nah, next console they'll use the "human eye can only see 30 fps" excuse haha.
Posted 08:33pm 11/10/12
Posted 08:37pm 11/10/12