




|
Post by Steve Farrelly @ 12:35pm 13/06/12 | 18 Comments
![]() Recently we reported that friend of the site, Danny Bilson, was let go from the firm as their core games boss, replaced with Naughty Dog co-Founder, Jason Rubin. However, Rubin's entry has already rocked the boat a little, with comments made recently to Polygon that he not only wants to grow THQ's flagship title, Saints Row, up, but that he's embarrassed by its potty humour and over-the-top adult themes. "Why couldn't [Saints Row] be a Red Dead Redemption or a Skyrim?" Rubin asked said. "I look at that title and I say "who cares what it is and why it got to be what it is?" From that team we can make something that isn't embarrassing. "It works for South Park, but I'm not sure it does elsewhere," he added. "I don't think [Volition] chose to do what they did because they had all of the options available to them. It was the environment at the time. I know I can change that." Ironically, recent comments by THQ head, Brian Farrell, talks about how digital sales of content for Saints Row: The Third is part of the reason they're rebounding from "rock bottom". "We're starting to pull out a little bit," he said of THQ's renewed focus. "Don't take my word for it, but if you look at our Q4 financial results, we look at that as a template for our future. "We have high-quality games," he continued. "A lot of the upside came from the digital downloads coming from Saints Row: The Third. So you ship a successful game, and the follow-on digital revenue is really strong. We had great cash flow as the result of those two things." It'll be interesting to see how Rubin's focus on the company maintains against its traditional, and clearly proven strides with a game like Saints Row: The Third, but one thing's for sure, they definitely need some form of shake-up, and perhaps the Naughty Dog co-founder is the man to do it. "Getting Jason Rubin was a huge win," Farrell said. "He is a smart, creative, but disciplined guy who has a vision to do even better on the core side. We also share a vision for where the industry is going and where the core business is going on a digital level. I'm personally re-energised. I think a lot of the company is too."
|
|
Posted 12:36pm 13/6/12
Posted 12:47pm 13/6/12
Posted 12:50pm 13/6/12
It is a massive money spinner for them though. Would a Saints Row 4 without that be anywhere near as successful?
Maybe Rubin could turn it about, maybe he could make a title such as Saints Row a must have game for it's quality as opposed to simply it's base content.
Posted 01:02pm 13/6/12
Posted 01:34pm 13/6/12
Posted 01:38pm 13/6/12
Posted 01:48pm 13/6/12
Fix some typos Steve!
Posted 03:03pm 13/6/12
Posted 03:54pm 13/6/12
Go ahead, give the team a new IP that is serious, but don't make Saints Row serious. It's like taking Brothers in Arms the direction Gearbox is with their latest addition. Make that game, just don't trash a franchise with it!
Posted 04:50pm 13/6/12
Saints Row should stay what it is IMO, I loved saints row 2&3 just because of the insanity, humour and fun. If THQ go ahead and decide to make saints row 4 into a serious game i'm not buying it at all.
Posted 04:57pm 13/6/12
Posted 05:06pm 13/6/12
Posted 05:09pm 13/6/12
Posted 06:06pm 13/6/12
I think that is a very important part of the article which changes how the article should be perceived.
Posted 08:57pm 13/6/12
I do agree that instead of wrecking current IPs with new ideas and gameplay they should make a spin off or a new IP for it. So if THQ is going to more more of a serious Saints Row, they should call it something different and change the setting etc. Another expample of wrecking IPs is Dragon Age 2, If Bioware wanted to make a console arcade game then go make it and leave Dragon Age alone.
Posted 11:00pm 13/6/12
Posted 11:00pm 13/6/12
Posted 03:08am 17/6/12
That is pretty much the entirety of Saints Row 3. Except, add nudity, corny combat, over the top situations, zombies, fighter planes, and making fun of people you run over.
Oh, at Burt Reynolds.