In case you missed it, the debut trailer for James Cameron's Avatar is now online, showing off what is -
already in trailer form - one of the most impressive looking sci-fi/fantasy films ever made.
To accompany the debut trailer for the movie, we also have a few screenshots from the game that will ship when it launches this December 18, from Ubisoft Montreal, check them out below.
We also have an interview session, hosted and filmed by Ubisoft with both the film and game's producers you can
view here.
Posted 01:42pm 21/8/09
Posted 01:42pm 21/8/09
Posted 01:47pm 21/8/09
Posted 07:27pm 21/8/09
All hail Cameron, exciting times my friends..
Posted 07:28pm 21/8/09
Posted 07:45pm 21/8/09
Posted 07:29pm 24/8/09
Posted 08:42pm 24/8/09
Posted 08:46pm 24/8/09
Posted 08:56pm 24/8/09
Posted 09:01pm 24/8/09
Posted 09:06pm 24/8/09
Posted 09:12pm 24/8/09
I don't want to use Quicktime.
Posted 09:36pm 24/8/09
Except for the "sci-fi part, it sounded just like he ripped it off from Dances with Wolves (which, IMO is a great film). It sounded so corny and predictable and story line still doesn't grab me... I think it's just over hyped. It might make a great game, however as a "movie" I think it misses the mark for me.
Posted 09:52pm 24/8/09
http://www.hd-trailers.net/blog/2009/08/20/direct-download-links-from-apple-are-not-working/
Posted 08:44pm 25/8/09
I debated long and hard about watching this trailer; I am so keen to see this (in the vague hope that its going to be a movie that I'm going to watch and it's not going to make me want to weep tears of blood at the state of the movie industry) and didn't want the trailer to do the usual thing it does and spoil it. I found it set the scene and story really well - really subtle but it's pretty clear what's going on story-wise
Posted 09:13pm 25/8/09
Sadly, like all CG-reliant movies, this just looked like watching a computer game, which, really, it is.
Posted 09:17pm 25/8/09
It really is something awesome
Posted 09:36pm 25/8/09
Posted 09:45pm 25/8/09
I'm consistently surprised at peoples inability when they encounter a plothole or some minor prob with a movie, to invent some filler material for themselves which allows the story to flow on and get more out of it instead of being "Shit story, massive plot hole" and leaving disgruntled.
That said, there are some movies can't be saved by doing so, fortunately I'm pretty good at this so I don't often get disappointed. Sure it's nice to see a movie where they get the whole lot together an just do it right. Unfortunately, there aren't that many talented producers/directors out there that can, even high profile ones.
Posted 10:01pm 25/8/09
I see it from a different light, my brother works at weta, worked on the movie and Iv seen a lot of it coming along from a while back and the technology and systems involved to make it is rather impressive.
I am no expert, but after working at Pandemic for 3 + years and being exposed to Weta a lot, I have a keen interest in this sort of thing.
The unfortunate part was, They have made this amazing CG movie, and only people who are interested in the technical side may really enjoy it, people looking for a story and dont care may not, I dont know yet but that is what I was refering too
Posted 10:21pm 25/8/09
Posted 10:33pm 25/8/09
p.s. that cg looks like a mixture of really good and really shit (fingers crossed for good story).
Posted 10:53pm 25/8/09
Posted 11:23pm 25/8/09
The guy plays wow.
That video interview is horrible, the two guys keep jerking each other off. Ubisoft is the best! Nothing about the game, more about how it was made, more about how they've jerked each other off. Hi can I get more info on the game. on top of that, the interviewer is annoying as hell.
last edited by greazy at 23:23:06 25/Aug/09
Posted 01:00am 26/8/09
Posted 08:29am 26/8/09
Pretty much! I often enjoy films even if they weren't spectacular. I find out if a movie has been given some good reviews first to make sure I'm not seeing a flop, but other than that, I don't go into the cinema looking for bad parts of a movie, I go into to hopefully enjoy it and usually do. That being said, I tend to only see the widely praised movies, which probably helps.
@Khel
Yeah but the Star Wars prequel CGI was pretty shit (impressive but terribly overpolished) :P But the worse thing is that he fucked up the story in regards to the sequel saga! TSK TSK
Posted 08:47am 26/8/09
Posted 09:04am 26/8/09
Don't get me wrong, I can appreciate the effort that go into something like this after all I am also a tech minded person but you can still spend a lot of efforts to make a "flop", perhaps too over worked, over loved or you're just basically blinded by your own bias because it's your "baby".
Basically you've made something which you (or very few) can truely appreciate - which is fine if that's your goal or you're making an art house film but, this is supposed to be a blockbuster movie and it's meant to make a shit load of cash so it has to appeal to people like Billy (for example).
I personally don't really care if it's CGI or real or whatever as long as the plot is good but, damn from the small chunks that I lifed from Wiki it is just well pretty lame for a "James Cameron". I guess everyone's allowed to make a mistake every once in a while, even if you're James Cameron.
Like I said the "movie" part might be a flop but the game will probably sell really well.
Posted 09:11am 26/8/09
Well maybe not fucked up, but it was inconsistent with the original saga. For one, Anakin met Obi Wan as a star pilot (one of the obvious differences).
@Opec
This may be true, but you haven't seen the movie yet, nor have I. So I'll pass judgement once its out. Too me it looks like it could be quite good.
Posted 09:15am 26/8/09
it puzzles me how people knock good cgi as 'too clean n shiny'...maybe they should use fkn muppets like the original star wars huh? ;p yeh that was just so awesome. heh
Posted 09:16am 26/8/09
Hence the:
So yeah I guess at this point it already doesn't grab me so.... I'll wait to watch it on Blu-ray :):)
Posted 09:46am 26/8/09
Which explains where there is a mix of good and bad CG
Posted 11:01am 26/8/09
after reading peoples opinions of the 15min preview last week, i cant fucking wait to see it in 3d.
Posted 11:51am 26/8/09
Take a look at the pyramids. They're just big piles of rock, right? If someone started building them today there wouldn't be a lot of excitement, and yet they are one of the wonders of the world! Their value is almost entirely due to the context of their building, the accompolishment, time and effort etc.
Art (especially realistic portraits) are obliterated by photography in terms of ease and correctness. And yet a good portrait can still be worth many thousands of dollars, even though it is technically inferior to a photograph, Primarily because of the skill and time involved.
Now all that said a popular movie really has to be entertaining above all else, even though people who appreciate the craft involved might be excited about technical aspects. This isn't a tech demo :)
Posted 12:08pm 26/8/09
Posted 12:12pm 26/8/09
Or they could use a lot more 'real' props and actors and stuff, like they did with Lord of the Rings. I got no problem with CGI, but when you start fully making characters in CGI and then placing them into a set which is made with CGI, it just starts becoming hard to swallow and looks a bit too wrong for my liking.
Posted 12:15pm 26/8/09
See I quite enjoy pure CGI flicks, but that's more in the way of appreciating animation than anything else. They are often quite visually stunning.
Posted 12:59pm 26/8/09
Posted 04:03pm 26/8/09
Posted 04:56pm 26/8/09
Posted 05:04pm 26/8/09
Surely the penis comment was a plant for Watchmen response.
Nobody could ever watch that movie and not think of it when "blue penis" is mentioned, ever again.
Posted 08:28pm 26/8/09
Posted 08:39pm 26/8/09
Posted 10:34pm 26/8/09
Maybe that's what JC should have done - make Avatar an Interactive Game.
Available on PC, Xbox360, PS3 just not at the movies.
Posted 11:31pm 26/8/09
Posted 01:25pm 27/8/09
People have started thinking it's about the movie.
Posted 01:51pm 27/8/09
Posted 04:51pm 27/8/09
Posted 01:25pm 28/8/09
2nd of all, one of you lads put up the basic plot to the story line. I read it it doesnt really enspire me either just from reading that. Ever read any Scifi/fantasy books? Cuz on the back of the cover there is usually a brief explanation of the story (plot) And they are always the same!
Good guy, bad guy.....bad guy wants to kill good guy and the chick that good guy rescued, who good guy soon discovers he's actually in love with said chick. Will Good guy stop bad guy save the world from tyrranny and save the chick he loves....
They are all the same basic discription of the fkn book!
My point being, dont judge a book by its cover. In this case the "plot" on the back. Its not the plot that makes the story, its the journey that gets you there that makes the story. I mean I think its a safe bet to say that at the end of Avatar they all live happily after. Predictable! but its what happens between the start and the end that matters and being old mate Camerons movie, im sure it will be a hell of a ride.
Posted 12:26pm 03/9/09
Posted 12:50pm 03/9/09
gamemoviethis first one blew me away.