The US-based Electronic Frontier Foundation is
reporting that Apple has made its first formal statement on the subject of jailbreaking your iPhone - and they reckon it ain't all that cool, claiming it is copyright infringement and a DMCA violation. As always the EFA is stepping up to the plate to do battle for the right to do whatever the hell you feel like with your own hardware.
Obviously it seems unlikely anything will happen because of this that would actually put a dent in jailbreaking, but at the same time it'd be nice for people not to be made to feel like criminals (or actually become one) for running an application that Apple doesn't want to let them. Stay tuned!
Posted 10:01pm 13/2/09
As long as the homebrew software is not used for piracy, why should it be problem?
Makes me want an android phone even more now.
Posted 10:24pm 13/2/09
I don't see how they get away with the phone being locked at all to be honest, especially given the phone's rapidly increasing market share.
Can you imagine the Anti-Competition fury if Microsoft stopped you running drivers and software on your computer that didn't have an MS stamp of approval?
last edited by Hogfather at 22:24:49 13/Feb/09
Posted 10:26pm 13/2/09
Posted 10:50pm 13/2/09
Posted 10:54pm 13/2/09
Its the DMCA and FTA.
You mean like vista 64 ?
Posted 11:52pm 13/2/09
Posted 12:40am 14/2/09
My non-legal/legal risk/assessed advice would be to assume that all usage not explicitly allowed by your vendor is potentially infringeing on a patent on copyright they own
That said I jailbreak my phones and fuck apple if they sue me for it. They're welcome to my credit-card debt.
Posted 01:33am 14/2/09
IIRC the dodgy thing about software/ EULA's these days are that your leasing the software? Happy to be corrected, I just remember reading something about that a while ago. I think it was something to do with Windows when I read it. Maybe it was something like your buying the license to use the software, but the software itself was still copyright by the company? Really cant remember, twas a few years ago. Anyone who knows more would love to hear what the current state of play is.
Posted 02:24am 14/2/09
wachoo talkin bout willis?
I'm using vista64 and have no trouble running software that isn't made or approved by MS.
I don't think it's fair to include drivers in there unless jailbreaking involves changing drivers as well admittedly I know knothing about the process.
The trouble is if they allow homebrew apps who is to say what the software is used for? What if someone writes an application that turns the iphone into a hackers tool to go around stealing peoples address book or something like the old blue tooth hacks that used to exist?
Posted 07:50am 14/2/09
If homebrew apps do something malicious to the jailbroken phone iteslf then the user who jailbroke it only has themselves to blame and would not receive technical support anyway, if it manages to exploit something in non-jailbroken phones that it can connect to then that's a security flaw in the normal iphone regardless and I don't think you could blame it on the jailbreaking.
Apple can't use the excuse of added security when they demonstrate that they are just trying to control the market to ensure less competition and more money for themselves (by blocking apps that compete directly with their own software).
Posted 07:48am 14/2/09
Posted 08:54am 14/2/09
About the only reason to jailbreak at the moment other then to pirate software is to tether you phone.
Compared to other people at work, I have significantly less problems (basically none) then nokia's or palms (palm make the buggiest phones known I think).
Posted 10:40am 14/2/09
Posted 10:58am 14/2/09
I just restored to 2.2.1 unjailbroken and things are back to fairly smooth. Was handy having those things but yeah bit too laggy.
Posted 02:29pm 14/2/09
It's been like that since the dawn of commercial software. Off the shelf shrinkwrap software isn't a product as such in the same way as the box and the media that you walk out of the store with are products.
Almost every single time when you part with $ for commercial software you just get a license to use it as long as you agree to the license terms. Implicit in the agreement is that the license can be revoked at any time. In practicality the license agreement is usually transferred to whoever owns the box & media, but not always (IIRC Windows licenses, once they are consumed, aren't transferrable).
Posted 04:39pm 14/2/09
To use the car analogy again, It's not like any fingers would be pointed at Holden if someone turned their Commodore into a Killdozer
Posted 06:10pm 14/2/09
Posted 06:20pm 14/2/09
In today's world, I rekon someone might sue Holden.
Posted 08:43pm 14/2/09
Posted 10:48am 15/2/09
Posted 02:01am 17/2/09
But that video clip is farken awesome - haven't seen it in YEARS. :D
Posted 10:58pm 17/2/09
Posted 11:18pm 17/2/09
I'm not sure what legitimate apps have come out since, but jailbreaking my Touch a few months ago gave me a command shell, SSH/FTP server to let me view PDFs locally, ScummVM (to play Monkey Island, etc) and a couple of other things I can't remember off the top of my head.
I haven't even used the device in ages as I don't listen to music out of the home/office, so it's been gathering dust.
Then again I don't have an iPhone so I can't comment on unique features for that, only the Touch.
last edited by parabol at 23:18:35 17/Feb/09
Posted 09:29am 18/2/09
Posted 10:22am 18/2/09
Yeah at the time there weren't [m]any good apps for offline PDF viewing, so FTP/SSHing localhost was the only way. No doubt there are proper free apps for PDFs now in the store.
Posted 09:44pm 18/2/09
NFI why Apple doesnt allow these things.
Posted 10:27pm 18/2/09