



|
Post by Steve Farrelly @ 10:06am 07/10/08 | 27 Comments
![]() Platinum Games, developer behind the bloody (yet stylish), Mad World, currently have no plans to even attempt to release Mad World in Australia (or Germany), after it was revealed they were also steering clear of their home market of Japan, disclosing the game would not even be shown at the upcoming Tokyo Game Show. According to a report over at MTV, Platinum Games have been working hand-in-hand with the ESRB, America's rating board, to ensure the game will be able to make release in North America. It was also revealed that after much struggling Rockstar's Wii-ified Manhunt 2 would finally see the light of day in the UK after it was banned by the BBFC last year. Rockstar appealed the decision which was then overturned, allowing the game a classification. It goes on sale October 31st, just in time for Halloween. Like Mad World though, there are currently no plans to attempt to release the game here in Australia. You can check out the trailer for Mad World right here to see what we'll likely be missing out on.
|
|
Posted 10:53am 07/10/08
No Flaming , No Bullshit guys just a straight answer please
As gamers is there anything we can do to make the government notice ? When I say as gamers I mean as a group of people on QGL and Ausgamers surely there is something as a collaborative we can do ? any ideas?
What I have done so far
1. Sent a letter to my member of parliament
2. Signed a few online petitions
3. Ranted my arse off in the forums about it lol (this serves no purpose bar my own release )
Posted 11:08am 07/10/08
Posted 11:23am 07/10/08
Some really good reads here too btw:
http://www.ieaa.com.au/research.html
Posted 11:39am 07/10/08
Posted 11:46am 07/10/08
average age of australian gamers is 24. not 28. 70% of gamers play once a week or more. so 30% of people who classify themselves as gamers play irregularly. barely half play a game for more than an hour at a time. unfortunately theres no spread of hours played per week versus age.
Posted 11:52am 07/10/08
Posted 11:56am 07/10/08
Posted 12:14pm 07/10/08
Posted 12:14pm 07/10/08
I think it's all a farce TBH. My favourite part of the farce is the 'content may change' message that you get when you play online (as though somehow the producer is responsible for online players that like to swear, threaten, and other such carry on).
Maybe everyone should have an automatic rating appended to their online nick, like sgt_pinky[R18+] - and then people can filter chat output based on nicks.
Posted 12:17pm 07/10/08
the government is scared of the negative consequences of policy change on their very conservative ageing voter base. and this applied equally to the coalition as it did to the ALP. they are equally guilty of this stasis which stops emerging super-violent blood thirsty games with cutting-edge technology from being approved Australian consumption.
I don't have a view either way on super violent games. i think its a little excessive, but some people want it so they should be free to consume with the appropriate classification.
but try getting that past the government. violent video games already run almost every second week on ACA. just watch the Hollowmen on ABC. then you will truly understand what a bunch of nervous nellies bureaucrats and politicians really are.
Posted 12:20pm 07/10/08
I think this is always the main problem - too much personal opinion. The way around that is to make sure that on the games rating board the cross-section of gamers is properly represented.
Posted 12:21pm 07/10/08
Posted 12:22pm 07/10/08
What about a cross-section of the general community? I don't think gamers would like their opinions somehow....
Posted 12:29pm 07/10/08
Yeah sorry, cross-section of general community is what I meant. But either way, the same argument always comes up, "Gamers avg. age is 28yo. There should be a classification...blah blah blah"
Posted 12:30pm 07/10/08
Posted 12:34pm 07/10/08
Posted 12:36pm 07/10/08
But as has been said it is not the board that prevents an R rating it is the government, and infi is right, it is safest for the government to do nothing.
Posted 01:29pm 07/10/08
Why not? They sell R18+ movies.
Posted 01:46pm 07/10/08
Posted 03:30pm 07/10/08
Posted 03:39pm 07/10/08
Posted 03:48pm 07/10/08
If you're paying, it should be your choice
Posted 04:58pm 07/10/08
Man asdjkalsjdklakjlda that religious fanatic is such an annoying cunt
Posted 05:15pm 07/10/08
Posted 05:28pm 07/10/08
Generally i would say gamers are a pretty tech savvy bunch.. how many gamers are actually persuaded not to aquire a game simply because it was refused classification? And what is the easiest way to do this? yea..
You can fill out all the petitions you like but its just a drop in the pond. What i think needs to happen is big industry figures and corporations need to start lobbying and putting pressure on the government for a reform of the system and i think we the gamers should be looking to them for help after all we are their bread and butter.
Posted 06:59pm 07/10/08
Posted 07:08pm 07/10/08
holy shit, that sounds just like me