Haha, bit rich putting the WiFi hotspot in that list considering how long it took Apple to come to terms with tethering or anything else remotely flexible.
I really think that this list is a fanboi with little idea,
most of that stuff was already happening before iphone (which is what, like 5 years old) sure we might not have had the explosion of smartphones, but the hardware was already been used,
hell, name one thing (honestly) new other than marketing it at a different market that iphone has given us ........................................................what? nothing.
I had a samsung i900 omnia, a smartphone that rivaled the iphone 3g. I got a 3g and compared them side by side, and except for multitasking (but with how iphone back then cleverly suspended tasks) nothing the windows phone could do could compete with the iphone. I shelved the omnia.
4 years later and the 4s is not significantly different day to day than the 3g, but android has been revolutionising. Who uses siri more than once a day? Everyone i know used it the day they got their new work phone. Then never again. What a sales point! psuedo widgets? Welcome to years ago.
Hoping windows 8 phones add something that changes the whole thing.
In another thread i turned my nokia into an iphone by removing the dialpad. Same black look, same silver bezel, same centre button. Extend the display into where the numpad is, and you get an iphone. Fucking genius. 1990's design award winning.
I don't agree with the iPhone diminishing handheld sales, which you can clearly see with the amount of money Nintendo makes off the 3DS and DS. Sure it makes things a lot easier having a smartphone that can play games, but there will always be a market for handheld games as they are a dedicated piece of hardware for playing games, where as a smartphone groups together several different functions causing lack of dedication to one.
i don't think the iphone "killed" any of the listed devices. it just doubled up the functionality. iphones didn't kill spirit levels... laser levellers did.
speech recognition has been a major military research project for years, fighter such as the gripen and F16 have had some for of those systems in use for over 10 years
also, they had programs in the 80's that would do speech recognition
add to that the siri was a product from another company that apple bought (and even Woz has been sighted saying that before apple played with it, it was better)
Did you know Steve Jobs invented speech recognition with the iPhone? Before that it didn't exist.
Did you know Steve Jobs invented time and space. Before the iPhone neither existed.
This article seems like a mega fanboy piece of shit. IIRC there was a phone that pre-dated the iphone that looked similar, but Apple have an awesome marketing team and marketed the iPhone very aggressively. I can't find that particular phone unfortunately.
lol?it didn't look to me like he was trolling, just being facetious toward apple fans ironically, you appear to have been trolled by a non-troll, while claiming it was a fail troll! =]
well in that case i'm going to sheepishly be absent for a few hours now
This Nokia 6600 phone was pretty smart. I remember having a few before this beast but nothing matched up to this really whilst most of the other stuff available was just fodder. 2003ish I think and it had most if not all bases covered.
Pretty much the only thing I'm completely grateful for the iPhone is the email integration for enterprise systems.
Please take the guys who made RIM out back and shoot and bury them :(
but iPhones weren't the first with this, Windows Mobile had this long before iPhones, I had this on my old clunky HTC TyTN II (which was out about a year before we saw an iphone)
but iPhones weren't the first with this, Windows Mobile had this long before iPhones, I had this on my old clunky HTC TyTN II (which was out about a year before we saw an iphone)
I agree it wasn't the first to do it - but it was probably the first to make it incredibly easy.
I don't care what it is, as long as its not a blackberry - I never want to support another RIM server again
what was so hard about supporting a RIM sever, I mean the system was robust, and had been working for along time
(as an end user, I always like the way the blackberry worked, and I still maintain for content generation it is far better than most other products still!, I will concede that consuming contend it much better on a touchscreen phone (like an iphone, or pick a android phone)
edit>>> also, everytime i'm "fucking" pissed off at something, i like the fact that on the berry it fucking, or furkin works, and it doesn't ducking autocorrect
no seriously, I've thrown it at walls, windows, cement floors, trying to break it and it still works with no cracked screen. It's a tank. In the end I gave up short of smashing it with a hammer & stopped looking for an excuse to buy a new phone and just bought one "because I can".
speech recognition has been a major military research project for years, fighter such as the gripen and F16 have had some for of those systems in use for over 10 years
Knight Rider had that shit in '82 so you and the military can suck it.
its not the iphone that was the big thing.. it was iOS. THAT is what launched smartphones into the mainstream because of its simplicity.
the line jobs used "the computer for the rest of us" is very true of iOS based devices.. anybody reading this forum would think "its too simple" and thats true because we are all fairly tech savy. however its the idea that your grand parents/parents/retarded pet monkey could use iOS that made the iphone explode in popularity not any hardware it contained besides the jump forward in screen (retina) iphone didnt really push anything... android phones have had the vast majority of tech advances far earlier than apple.
all this coming from someone who uses apple products all day every day.. from computers to phones and tablets... i also own windows pc's and android devices.. so i swing both ways /shrug iphones are great looking devices.. however android (with the galaxy s2 and 3 primarily) have caught up with the stylish device looks and hardware wise far exceed apple.
My Razr V3 could beat up an iPhoneno seriously, I've thrown it at walls, windows, cement floors, trying to break it and it still works with no cracked screen. It's a tank. In the end I gave up short of smashing it with a hammer & stopped looking for an excuse to buy a new phone and just bought one "because I can".
buddy of mine had a v3 and dropped in about 6-7 storeys off scaffolding while on the job. besides cracking that batteryc over thing (where you push the silver button to pop it off) it still worked fine i was quite suprised and bought one myself
what was so hard about supporting a RIM sever, I mean the system was robust, and had been working for along time (as an end user, I always like the way the blackberry worked, and I still maintain for content generation it is far better than most other products still!, I will concede that consuming contend it much better on a touchscreen phone (like an iphone, or pick a android phone) edit>>> also, everytime i'm "fucking" pissed off at something, i like the fact that on the berry it fucking, or furkin works, and it doesn't ducking autocorrect
RIM Servers were an addon for Exchange and required special setup configurations. Updating them has always been a tremendous pain in the ass.
Also if you run it enterprise level and a handset fucks up - say stops receiving email - the blackberry book says 'reset the handset' which means securely wiping it, re creating the account on the RIM server, resetting policy and then readding the phone - It's a gigantic fuckaround and I'm so glad I don't have to deal with them anymore.
iPhone/Windows phones/Android phones shit all over blackberry and their dumb system for connecting to mailservers and authentication. This is strictly from a sys admin/support point of view - I've never liked using the handsets either but hey each to their own - just don't run a RIM server.
lol replaced digital cameras? im yet to see an iphone pic that was taken with anything less than full light that doesn't have hundreds of grainy pixels trying to fly at the viewer.
lol? it didn't look to me like he was trolling, just being facetious toward apple fans ironically, you appear to have been trolled by a non-troll, while claiming it was a fail troll! =]