Internet activist and computer prodigy Aaron Swartz, who helped create an early version of the Web feed system RSS and later played a key role in stopping an online piracy bill in Congress, has committed suicide at age 26, authorities said on Saturday.
Pretty sad. Before age 26 he achieved more than most of us even begin to aspire to in our entire lives, and it still wasn't enough to put his mind at ease.
What I was thinking is that the legal system pays no attention to mental health. No doubt the stress of something like a looming prison sentence and the pressure and drain of going through the court system (federal trial no less) - probably not a great thing from someone suffering from depression. The prosecution would probably just love it if you killed yourself anyway.
Aaron was depressed about his pending trial; the charges carried theoretical maximums of decades in prison. If that was the chief cause of his suicide, then the U.S. government has caused a great evil in the course of trying to punish a much lesser one. He was almost certainly guilty of some computer-misuse misdemeanors at least, but to press such heavy felony charges against him was a serious misuse of prosecutorial discretion.
The classic case of where someone says "I don't want to live on this planet anymore" and there isn't the option to be able to live on another one.
He achieved more in the last dozen years than whole family trees have in generations on generations.
I feel bad for him, it sounds like his forward thinking and improvements to society were rewarded with criminalisation, being treated with punishments worse than rape and manslaughter.
It's like society lost something valuable when someone like that dies.
It's interesting how hard they pursued this guy for the 'damage' he caused. Compare that to stock brokers and CEO's who put the entire world into the shit... only Iceland has done something about that.
Depression is different to suiciding because you fear Prison.
Seems he was already Ill.
""Information is power. But like all power, there are those who want to keep it for themselves," Swartz wrote in an online "manifesto" dated 2008.
"The world's entire scientific and cultural heritage, published over centuries in books and journals, is increasingly being digitized and locked up by a handful of private corporations. ...sharing isn't immoral — it's a moral imperative. Only those blinded by greed would refuse to let a friend make a copy," he wrote.
I fucking hate the way the term manifesto is thrown around to make someone sound like the crazed author of the next mein kampf. The dude published lots of essays.