big deal?
It has the potential to be used for lie detection or to scan crowds for people with "altered" vitals, to come to some sort of conclusion (criminal, terrorist, etc) - such as what they wanted to do with a thermal tech 10 years back:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/01/0102_020102TVsensor.html
Might not sound bad at first glance, but some would consider it an invasion of privacy and also not a reliable way of drawing conclusions. What if I'm at an airport stressing out over something about work/family, or if I'm unwell - does that justify security to come and chat with me or put me in holding because I'm looking a bit agitated or shifty from the cameras, "just in case"?
Not to sound Faceman-ish, but given the crazy stuff the UK has been doing with surveillance and security over the last 10-15 years it's not that far fetched.
last edited by parabol at 10:32:49 24/Jun/12